Common Sense (Returning Reason to the Political and Social Conversation)

And Now, For Something Completely Different!

Please Check Out My New Website-Then, Tell A Friend

4.21.2008

Obama In 30 Seconds-Political Insanity





So Moveon.org has this contest. "Obama In 30 Seconds." Just make a 30 second commercial about Barack Obama that portrays an effective and positive message in an original way. The winner gets a bunch of money to spend on video editing equipment and their ad will be aired on national television.


Take a look at my ad in the "Obama In 30 Seconds" contest. I call it "Political Insanity." It's not real flashy, not over-polished. Kind of like the candidate it supports. And I think it gets the point across. Once you've seen it, do me a favor and toss me a vote. You can do this directly by going here, watching the ad, and filling your name, e-mail and zipcode. Then you'll need to watch for the return e-mail confirmation to make your vote count. It really is pretty easy.

After you vote me up, you'll get to view other ads. You can rate these too, including mine if it comes up for you. Give good marks to the ads that are most effective (the real point of an ad), most original (tricky to judge when you begin, but here's a hint: a lot of these ads have kids delivering a message or a bunch of people either holding signs or speaking a few words to make a coherent message at the end. Original? Your call), and most creative.


The top 15 ads in moveon.org's "Obama In 30 Seconds" contest (top 10 in ratings, top 5 in direct views) go to the final round of voting.


So, do a friend (or even complete stranger) a solid and toss me a vote.


(P.S. - While the point of this contest is to boost Obama awareness in general, you do not have to like or agree with Obama, Democrats, Moveon.org, or any other particular view. You could just watch my ad and give me a vote just to be nice.)


Thanks.

posted by Ken Grandlund @ 8:34 PM  

If you enjoy reading articles on Common Sense, you may want to visit Bring It On! where Ken Grandlund is a contributing author several days a week.

4.16.2008

Most Tax Dollars Spent On Military

tanks


Now that you've finished your taxes for the year, I thought a little refresher on where those tax dollars are being spent would be in order. So without further adieu, here is where your federal tax dollars are spent:

MOST TAX DOLLARS SPENT ON MILITARY


Out of every tax dollar collected by the US government,


42.2¢ goes to the military to pay for wars, weapons, and every now and then a few bucks for a wounded soldier.


22.1¢ goes to health care initiatives like Medicare and Medicaid and a few pennies for those pesky kids programs.


10.2¢ towards non-military debt-you know, paying off that national debt that comes from bigger government under Republican administrations.


8.7¢ funds anti-poverty programs like welfare, foodstamps, and shelters.


4.4¢ gets thrown at education where it is promptly turned into administrator salaries and profits for the big companies who print standardized testing materials.


3.9¢ underwrites the costs of governmental services-from the courts and justice systems to the lifetime benefits our elected officials receive but would never let the rest of us have.


3.3¢ pays the bills for any projects related to affordable housing and community development-mostly this is used to buy poisonous FEMA trailers from some corporation tied to the current administration.


2.6¢ is spent to promote and explore the wonders of science and space, the future of cleaner, renewable energy, and to protect the environment...no, really, it IS!!!


1.5¢ of every dollar is for agriculture and transportation. Half to farmers to keep them from planting certain crops and half to people who can't seem to make a road that lasts more than a season or two.


and finally,


1¢ gets sent abroad in the form of foreign aid-but only to countries who promote abstinence, fight terrorists, or lend us lots of money.


I know this only adds up to 99.9¢ out of a dollar...I guess that other tenth of a cent is beign siphoned off the top ala Office Space and is accumulating in a slush fund somewhere for out of work politicians to draw from in case of a caviar emergency or something. (Hey...a tenth of a cent can really add up when you're talking billions of dollars in tax receipts.)


(BTW- these numbers were culled from a slide show presented at cnbc.com)


Cross posted at Bring It On!

posted by Ken Grandlund @ 9:44 AM  

If you enjoy reading articles on Common Sense, you may want to visit Bring It On! where Ken Grandlund is a contributing author several days a week.

4.01.2008

Clinton Calls It Quits, Joins McCain Ticket for '08

In a surprise move, campaign officials for democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton are to announce April 1 that the New York Senator is withdrawing from the Democratic presidential primaries and is joining Republican presidential candidate John McCain's ticket as his running mate. Political insiders and beltway pundits alike were surprised at the timing of the announcement, but not altogether shocked by this latest development. Clinton has been running second place to Democratic rival Barack Obama for months now, her campaign war chest is running low on funds, contributors to her campaign are tapped out, and many long time political allies have been leaving the campaign in droves.

CAMPAIGN OFFICIAL CONFIRMS RUMORS


According to an anonymous Clinton campaign official, Mrs. Clinton feels she has a better chance of realizing her lifelong dream to become president of the United States by switching parties now. Once the pre-ordained Democratic nominee, a string of primary losses to Obama have put the Clinton campaign into a downward spiral.

“She sees the writing on the wall. Clearly, this isn’t her husband’s Democratic
Party anymore,” said the campaign official. “If we’ve learned anything over the
past few years, it’s that sometimes experienced politicians have to do
courageous things in order to continue to help America. Joe Lieberman did it in
2006. Hillary is doing it now.”

SUPPORTERS STAND FIRM, OPPONENTS INDIFFERENT


Some Clinton supporters think the move is brilliant, and will continue to support Hillary no matter what ticket she’s on.

“I think it’s brilliant, “ said Nancy Bigbee of Westchester, Vermont. “McCain’s
like, what, 75 years old or something? She’ll probably be president in no time
this way.”


And that nugget may well hold some gold in it. McCain’s health hasn’t been much of an issue in this campaign, but he is 70 years old, and would be the oldest president ever sworn in to a first term if elected. A bitter Democratic primary season has battered Mrs. Clinton among her former party, making it a long shot for her to get the nomination at this point. This is likely her best shot now at getting back into the White House.

Obama supporters have mixed feelings about the announcement, being somewhat happy that the bitter in-fighting will finally end, but mostly being indifferent, having stopped listening to Clinton months ago.

WEEKS IN THE MAKING


Rumors of a possible Clinton party switch have been circling Washington recently following Sen. Clinton’s media appearances with Rush Limbaugh, Fox News, and Richard Mellon Scaife, a vociferously staunch opponent of Mrs. Clinton and her husband, former president Bill Clinton, for years. Even Ann Coulter loves her. Democrats have been not so quietly rumbling about what they saw as her attempts to cozy up to the “vast right wing conspiracy” she once railed against. Senator Clinton’s own recent comments also seem to have been quietly laying the groundwork for just such a tactic. Earlier last month she repeated on several talk shows that both she and Senator McCain had the lifetime of dedicated experience needed to run this country, something her former Democratic opponent Barack Obama didn’t have. In fact, up until today’s announcement, Senator Clinton had been Senator McCain’s best campaigner, with her repeated attempts to derail the Obama campaign.

“All of the dirty tricks of the last few weeks, from the NAFTA frame-up against
Obama in Ohio to the subtly drawn out race issues and Reverend Wright
associations to the sublimation of the primary rules in Florida and Michigan-
all these things and more have been part of the Clinton campaign’s efforts to
divide the Democratic party and bring some votes over to a McCain-Clinton
ticket,” said the unnamed Clinton campaign official.


When asked about the timing of the announcement, coming on the heels of Senator Clinton’s steadfast refusal to leave the Democratic race before the end of the primary season, this same official noted that, “April is clearly the time to strike. We know what we’re doing here. We’re not a bunch of fools.”

WIN-WIN FOR GOP?


But what does a McCain-Clinton ticket hold for Republicans? For starters, Hillary Clinton began her political life as a Barry Goldwater disciple, the former Arizona Republican and presidential candidate in 1964. Long embraced by the more conservative Republicans, Hillary’s early associations with Goldwater’s brand of politics probably runs deep in her own political psyche, proving her to be a Republican at heart. It’s not just coincidence that McCain also hails from Arizona.

But more than just her conservative underpinnings, Clinton brings to the GOP ticket that tough, but feminine touch that’s been missing all these years- like Margaret Thatcher did for Britain’s Conservative party in the 1980’s. Conventional wisdom holds that Republicans, especially women, wouldn’t vote for Clinton come hell or high water, but that truth probably won’t hold at the ballot box. During her husband’s Oval Office infidelities, Mrs. Clinton stood by her man to the end. While derided at the time for by many women’s groups, then First-Lady Clinton unknowingly started a trend that has been seen all too often these last seven years during GOP prominence. For every Congressman convicted of taking bribes there’s been a wife by their side. For every GOP sex scandal (from cruising for page boys to soliciting in the airport bathroom) there’s been a tightly smiling GOP wife by her man. These women credit Hillary for their strength almost as much as they do their faith. Clearly Clinton can hold her own with this demographic at the polls. And that’s one area McCain clearly needs help with.

Hillary also shows promise that she is willing to carry on with some of the more popular Bush policies like the War in Iraq, by giving life to the falsehood that she had to dodge sniper fire on a trip to Bosnia while serving as First Lady. Such inspired untruth telling shows she’s not only ready, but also willing to say anything to get her point across. This is the kind of trait Republicans love in there politicians-the power to change reality to fit the situation at hand.

Both Clinton and McCain bill themselves as Bi-Partisan leaders and they’ve proven this much. Both reached across the aisle to support the Iraq War. Both supported the Illegal Alien Amnesty bill brought forth by Senator McCain and Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) before they opposed it. Both supported Bush’s No Child Left Behind program too, and still support it generally despite its high costs to states, narrowed curriculum geared towards testing, and less than stellar results. In these and many other issues, Hillary Clinton and John McCain seem to make the perfect political couplet in generations.

LAST, BEST SHOT AT WHITE HOUSE



But the bottom line is that Hillary Clinton has had her sights set on the presidency for decades. It is her life long dream and from her point of view, this year was supposed to be “her” year. She’d hoped to take the prize under the Democrats banner, if only to tie the double-shot secured by the Bush clan. But with Barack Obama clearly the popular choice among registered Democratic voters, and among many Independents too, Mrs. Clinton is realist enough to know that her only ride back to Pennsylvania Avenue is in the back seat of John McCain’s limo- and faced with the prospect of losing it all, a short stint as VP looks pretty good to her now.

The announcement, scheduled for release on April 1, 2008, also noted that both Senators McCain and Clinton would be unreachable for comment for most of the day, as they will be coordinating their campaign strategies for the next phase of the campaign.


(cross-posted at Bring It On!)

posted by Ken Grandlund @ 12:00 AM  

If you enjoy reading articles on Common Sense, you may want to visit Bring It On! where Ken Grandlund is a contributing author several days a week.

3.18.2008

Towards A More "Perfect" America

Race. Like it or not, race is still an issue in America. Generations after the civil rights marches, and more than a century since the Civil War, race is still an issue in America. And no matter how far we push the conflicts of race to the corners of our minds and to the fringes of our society, race is still an issue in America. You may not think this is true. In every coffee shop and in every mall and in every schoolhouse you will find whites and blacks and Asians and Hispanics. People of all color hold positions of prominence and authority just as they all occupy the lower rungs of our society. It is true that in many areas of our lives, the matter of ones racial identity has become almost moot. But this is only the surface, the part that we expose in public or polite company. Yet the racial inequality that lies at the heart of the American experience can't be swept away so easily, for it lies buried in the generational experiences of our elders, it perpetuates itself in familial memories, and it is always an underlying scapegoat for each races misfortunes. Humanity is always cruelest to its own members.


White Americans descend from persecuted pilgrims or poor immigrants. Their roots began in flight from religious oppression or corrupted Old World governments. But in their determination to improve their own lot and secure their own freedoms, they exerted the same negative aspects on other races they encountered. Native Americans were slaughtered and impoverished. Blacks were held in slavery and beaten down. Even white women were burdened under the yolk of white male supremecy. As years passed on, the idea of America, and it's quest for perfect individual freedom and respect has helped liberate these groups and others from racially motivated discrimination. But the memories remain, and the policies of the past still touch and color the lives of the historically oppressed.


Race issues are still among us. They made us who we are today. They have historically divided us and made many America's where there should be but one.


That race has become an issue in this presidential election is no surprise given the history of America and the fact that the leading Democratic candidate is a half black-half white American. That it is being used to denigrate that candidate by his opponent, a white woman, is a little more than unfortunate. In trying to paint Barack Obama as a covert racist (or as someone who would deingrate the potential of White America in favor of righting the historical wrongs done to Black America), Hillary Clinton proves the dictum laid earlier: Humanity is always cruelest to its own members. The quest for the presidency takes all sorts. Hillary Clinton has proven to me at least that her quest for the presidency is not to make America a markedly better and different place, but rather is an effort to make her own personal history complete, at least as she sees it to be. Barack Obama, on the other hand, has shown me time and again that his quest is not for personal destiny or pride but for a better America for us all-white, black, yellow, green, or purple.


Today in Philadelphia, Obama gave a speech to address the race issue. Comments made by his former church pastor have been foisted into the media spotlight by Clinton campaign supporters, comments that exude the angst and historical anger blacks have towards the policies of white America. The media bandwagon had whipped this pastor's comments into a front page issue, and for those who only follow politics tangentially, the idea could be drawn that Obama not only agrees with the divisive comments of his former minister, but that if elected he would somehow work to reverse all the historical wrongs in one fell swoop.


In his speech today, titles "A More Perfect Union," Barack Obama not only dispelled those fears and false claims, but he showed himself to be an honorable man and a "more perfect presidential candidate" than anyone else in the field. With eloquence and humility, Obama explained why he can vigorously disagree with his former pastor's comments without throwing the man under the proverbial bus.


Some excerpts may help for those who didn't get to hear the speech:


I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend
Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain.
Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and
foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be
considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree
with many of his political views? Absolutely - just as I'm sure many of you have
heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly
disagreed.


But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren't simply
controversial. They weren't simply a religious leader's effort to speak out
against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view
of this country - a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates
what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America...


Reverend Wright's comments were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at
a time when we need unity; racially charged at a time when we need to come
together to solve a set of monumental problems - two wars, a terrorist threat, a
falling economy, a chronic health care crisis and potentially devastating
climate change; problems that are neither black or white or Latino or Asian, but
rather problems that confront us all.


As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me. He strengthened
my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children. Not once in my
conversations with him have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in
derogatory terms, or treat whites with whom he interacted with anything but
courtesy and respect. He contains within him the contradictions - the good and
the bad - of the community that he has served diligently for so many years.


I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no
more disown him than I can my white grandmother - a woman who helped raise me, a
woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she
loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black
men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has
uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.


These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this
country that I love.
We all of us hear coments from people we respect or
trust or love that rub us the wrong way. But we do not disown these people or
banish them from our own lives. Why should Obama do any different? Instead, his
is a position of realism-he knows there are racial divides that lie under the
surface and sometimes rear their ugly heads at inopportune or embarrassing
times. People are imperfect, even as they strive not to be.


Yet I am confounded. Why is it okay for the GOP to be ensconced with religiously motivated hatred towards homosexuality and this not be cause for general alarm or cries of discrimination? Why can a GOP candidate receive the blessing of a Bob Jones University and not be held in disdain? The easy answer is because America still is not equal for everyone. The harder answer is that America still subtly condons discrimination against other Americans, that humanity is still trapped by her historical racial and religious divides. Barack Obama won't be able to change these facts overnight if elected, but he certainly recognizes them, understands their roots, and realizes that the path ahead comes not from pretending these problems are solved, but in admitting that these problems of the past have brought us ALL to where we are today. While our differences may have divided us in the past to brought us to our problems today, only by working together can we solve the immense problems that affect us all right now.


For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that
breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as
spectacle - as we did in the OJ trial - or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in
the aftermath of Katrina - or as fodder for the nightly news. We can play
Reverend Wright's sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from
now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or
not the American people think that I somehow believe or sympathize with his most
offensive words. We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence
that she's playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will
all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his
policies.


We can do that.


But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we'll be talking
about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another one. And
nothing will change.


That is one option. Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come
together and say, "Not this time." This time we want to talk about the crumbling
schools that are stealing the future of black children and white children and
Asian children and Hispanic children and Native American children. This time we
want to reject the cynicism that tells us that these kids can't learn; that
those kids who don't look like us are somebody else's problem. The children of
America are not those kids, they are our kids, and we will not let them fall
behind in a 21st century economy. Not this time.


This speech today, perhaps more than any other he has given, shows that Barack Obama is the right leader for America today. It was the kind of speech that filled my heart with hope and my mind with pride. "This is my candidate speaking," I thought as I drove through traffic listening on the radio. "This is why I support Obama."


There is much more in the body of the speech that you need to read if you didn't get a chance to hear it live. Indeed, it is a speech that every voting American should take the time to read. You should read it because of what it says about America's racial history. You should read it because of what it says about Barack Obama and his own views on race in America. You should read it because of what it says about who we are, where we are going if we don't change course, and where we can be if we do.


The economy, health care, the environment, and the future of our children and our neighbors children demand that we change how we live, work, and play in this coming century. Different solutions to todays problems must be found. Our way of life may well have to change dramatically if we are to push forward towards more freedom and equality for all. We cannot do this with politicians who exploit of divisions to gain self importance or power. We can only move forward if we move forward together. Who better to guide us along this path right now than Barack Obama?

(cross posted at Bring It On!)

posted by Ken Grandlund @ 9:47 AM  

If you enjoy reading articles on Common Sense, you may want to visit Bring It On! where Ken Grandlund is a contributing author several days a week.

3.06.2008

No Taming This Shrew-Hillary Finally Showing Her True Colors

“I think you'll be able to imagine many things Senator McCain will be able to
say.“He’s never been the president, but he will put forth his lifetime of
experience. I will put forth my lifetime of experience. Senator Obama will put
forth a speech he made in 2002.” - Hillary
Clinton before the Texas and Ohio primaries.


And with that comment, Hillary Clinton proclaimed to the nation that if she can't have the presidential nomination then the whole Democratic party might as well just vote Republican, because if the choice ends up being between McCain and Obama, well then Hillary thinks that four more years of Bush-like policies are A-OK for America.


Sounds like Hillary has Joe Lieberman for an advisor. If the Democrats don't give you what is obviously rightfully yours to take, then the hell with them! Better to side with the law-breaking, torture loving, warmongering, Bush GOP than actually listen to the people of this country when they tell you that they prefer someone else for the top job.


Of course, when Hillary makes statements like the one above, it only highlights why so many Democrats-and so many Americans of all political flavors-have thrown their support behind Barack Obama. We don't want a president who thinks that decades of experience in a crooked political system is a plus. We don't want another president who refuses to acknowledge the reality of a situation, who thinks that she should just get her way because, by golly, it's her turn and she's due. We don't want another imperialistic attitude sitting in the Oval Office, pretending that things will only be better with her in charge, that no one else (save the opposition party nominee) can quite handle the task. We don't want another presidential election that boils down to a choice between bad and worse. And this time, we actually have a chance to change those dynamics by giving the nomination to Obama.


But for Hillary the equation is a different one altogether. For Hillary, the question isn't who can better help to end corruption in government or who can give America back her reputation in the world or even who will inspire Americans to get back to building a better country and world. Nope, for Hillary the only question is "How can I win this thing?" And in answering that question, she shows that for her, winning is the only thing that matters.


Debate after debate has proven to voters that on many domestic issues, both Clinton and Obama share similar goals, varying mostly in the details of policy than in the necessity of movement. But under the surface is where the differences lie, and voters have figured out that where Obama seeks to empower us all, Hillary simply seeks power for its own sake-and for her own sense of personal destiny.


Since falling behind Obama in the delegate count, Hillary has pulled out all the stops to paint Obama as unprepared for the task of being president, hoping that by highlighting his so-called "inexperience" that voters will flock under her banner. It simply hasn't worked. Even her primary victories in Texas, Ohio, and Rhode Island were slim victories and weren't enough to even narrow the gap in the delegate count. But what Hillary seems to ignore at this stage of the game is the fact that many, many Republicans are less than satisfied with McCain as their nominee. These GOPers are now watching the Democratic race and asking themselves a serious question-could they vote for a Democrat? For many, if the candidate is Hillary the answer in a resounding "NO." But if it is Obama, there are many who will jump ship and vote for a Democrat. At least they would if the vote was held today. But if Hillary-who they will never vote for in the general election-continues to portray Obama as a weak choice for Democrats, she is also hurting him for the general election and giving McCain a better shot of winning the prize. For someone who claims to despise the Bush Administration, stumping (even discreetly) for the GOP nominee who puts forth ambitions not so unlike those of Bush seems an odd way of telling voters that they should pick you. Especially Democratic voters who would rather sit in a pit of vipers than give the White House to another Bush-like contender.


Michael Gerson said it well in this Washington Post article:


"Though it is increasingly unlikely, Clinton may still have a path to the
nomination -- and what a path it is. She merely has to puncture the balloon of
Democratic idealism; sully the character of a good man; feed racial tensions
within her party; then eke out a win with the support of unelected
superdelegates, thwarting the hopes of millions of new voters who would see an
inspiring young man defeated by backroom arm-twisting and arcane party rules."


Indeed. And what a presidential path to victory that is.


But as she keeps on campaigning against Obama, she keeps highlighting her own presidential unworthiness by trying to paint Obama as some untested, incapable hack who showed up at the last minute and fooled us all into taking away what was and should be hers and hers alone.
Like when she tried to throw light on a land purchase Obama made. Obama acknowledged that the deal was a bad idea and has taken responsibility for his actions. He's not denying the mistake, not battling to have records hidden. And yet for Hillary Clinton, years were spent examining a little land deal called Whitewater, years which she fought and fought to keep the whole thing under wraps.


And this whole "experience" thing is a real laugh too, especially if you look back to the 1992 campaign of her husband. Bill Clinton was so overmatched by the senior George Bush when it came to government service and experience that the Clinton's had to portray his candidacy around a different theme- something they called "change." Funny how what seemed such a good idea in 1992 (and was a good idea by the way) is now some kind of harbinger of failure if Obama wins the nomination. And let's be real here- Hillary isn't all that much more "experienced" at being president that anyone else who has never been president.


And then there is Hillary's tendency towards secrecy. In a move that likely inspired Dick Cheney's own energy meetings, Hillary has yet to fully release the documents related to her own health care meetings in the early 1990's. She has yet to release her income tax returns even though Obama has done so and even though when running for Senate in 2000 she screamed about how her opponent didn't release his returns. A small bit of hypocrisy that reveals a lot about the candidate herself.


And now her latest flop is with regards to the Florida and Michigan primaries-she "won" both events, despite a pledge not to campaign and now wants those delegates added to her tally. Of course, she and all the other candidates knew well in advance that those states' delegates were not going to count because of some disagreement with the DNC and the stat Democratic parties. Obama (and the others still in the race at the time) followed the rules and stayed out of the states, in Michigan no name but Hillary even appeared on the ballot. But now that she is losing what is rightfully hers, she wants to change the game and get those delegates in. Tell me again how Hillary would be a different, better president that Bush? After all, lying and cheating and ignoring the rules doesn't seem to have made this country a better place in the last eight years.


And for goodness sakes, I'm not even mentioning her many corporate ties that make her incapable of legislating purely for her constituents, or her support for the war in Iraq, or her willingness to ignore the massive abuses of law perpetrated by Team Bush.


All grace and honorable when she was the presumed "inevitable" nominee, Hillary Clinton coming in second isn't such a noble character. I suspect though that this is a more true representation of who Hillary Clinton really is, and of who she would be as president of this country.


And these are just some more reasons why I support Barack Obama.


(cross posted at Bring It On!)

posted by Ken Grandlund @ 10:54 AM  

If you enjoy reading articles on Common Sense, you may want to visit Bring It On! where Ken Grandlund is a contributing author several days a week.

Books I've Read Recently

 After Downing Street Coalition
Animal of the Day

Promote Common SensePut this banner on your blog!

Bloggy Award
Read the Review
Read the Second Review

Common Sense Bumper Stickers Just Click, Open, and Print!

Join Us Now!

Help Troops In Iraq

Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
To see more details, click here.

The Circumstances of the world are continually changing, and the opinions of men also; and as Government is for the living, and not for the dead, it is the living only that has any right in it. That which may be thought right and found convenient in one age may be thought wrong and inconvenient in another. In such cases, Who is to decide, the living or the dead?

Rights of Man (Thomas Paine)

Technorati search

Donate Food to the HungryDonate Food to the Hungry

Save Endangered WildernessHelp Protect Endangered Lands

Help Fight Breast CancerHelp Fight Breast Cancer

Other Thoughts

Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the fatigues of supporting it.

The Crisis (Thomas Paine)

Vote for me on the Koufax Awards!
Read The Series!
Essay 1
Essay 2
Essay 3
Essay 4

Things I'm Not Selling


Democracy is never an all or nothing proposition. Take from these thoughts that which you will, and apply them generously. For the seeds of Common Sense abound in these essays, and they are for all of us to share!

Help Needy Children
Help Needy Children

Donate Books To Kids
Help Kids Read

Help Abandoned Pets
Help Feed Shelter Pets

Marriage Is For Everyone.
      
You Got A Problem With Freedom?

Americans For Inclusive in Debates Alliance Blogroll

Know Your History...

TIME FOR COMMON SENSE
Archive Listing by Date
  • 01.02.2005
  • 01.09.2005
  • 01.16.2005
  • 01.23.2005
  • 01.30.2005
  • 02.06.2005
  • 02.13.2005
  • 02.20.2005
  • 02.27.2005
  • 03.06.2005
  • 03.13.2005
  • 03.20.2005
  • 03.27.2005
  • 04.03.2005
  • 04.10.2005
  • 04.17.2005
  • 04.24.2005
  • 05.01.2005
  • 05.08.2005
  • 05.15.2005
  • 05.22.2005
  • 05.29.2005
  • 06.05.2005
  • 06.12.2005
  • 06.19.2005
  • 06.26.2005
  • 07.03.2005
  • 07.10.2005
  • 07.24.2005
  • 07.31.2005
  • 08.07.2005
  • 08.14.2005
  • 08.21.2005
  • 08.28.2005
  • 09.04.2005
  • 09.11.2005
  • 09.18.2005
  • 09.25.2005
  • 10.02.2005
  • 10.09.2005
  • 10.16.2005
  • 10.23.2005
  • 10.30.2005
  • 11.06.2005
  • 11.13.2005
  • 11.20.2005
  • 11.27.2005
  • 12.04.2005
  • 12.11.2005
  • 12.18.2005
  • 12.25.2005
  • 01.01.2006
  • 01.08.2006
  • 01.15.2006
  • 01.29.2006
  • 02.05.2006
  • 02.12.2006
  • 02.19.2006
  • 02.26.2006
  • 03.05.2006
  • 03.12.2006
  • 03.19.2006
  • 03.26.2006
  • 04.02.2006
  • 04.09.2006
  • 04.23.2006
  • 05.07.2006
  • 05.14.2006
  • 05.21.2006
  • 05.28.2006
  • 06.04.2006
  • 06.11.2006
  • 06.18.2006
  • 07.02.2006
  • 07.09.2006
  • 07.16.2006
  • 07.23.2006
  • 07.30.2006
  • 08.06.2006
  • 08.13.2006
  • 08.20.2006
  • 09.10.2006
  • 09.17.2006
  • 10.01.2006
  • 10.15.2006
  • 10.22.2006
  • 10.29.2006
  • 11.05.2006
  • 11.19.2006
  • 11.26.2006
  • 12.03.2006
  • 12.10.2006
  • 12.17.2006
  • 12.31.2006
  • 01.07.2007
  • 01.14.2007
  • 01.21.2007
  • 01.28.2007
  • 02.04.2007
  • 02.11.2007
  • 02.18.2007
  • 02.25.2007
  • 03.04.2007
  • 03.11.2007
  • 03.18.2007
  • 03.25.2007
  • 04.08.2007
  • 04.15.2007
  • 04.22.2007
  • 04.29.2007
  • 05.06.2007
  • 05.13.2007
  • 05.20.2007
  • 05.27.2007
  • 06.03.2007
  • 06.10.2007
  • 06.17.2007
  • 06.24.2007
  • 07.08.2007
  • 07.22.2007
  • 08.12.2007
  • 09.16.2007
  • 09.23.2007
  • 09.30.2007
  • 10.07.2007
  • 11.04.2007
  • 11.11.2007
  • 11.18.2007
  • 12.02.2007
  • 12.16.2007
  • 12.30.2007
  • 01.06.2008
  • 01.13.2008
  • 01.27.2008
  • 02.10.2008
  • 02.17.2008
  • 02.24.2008
  • 03.02.2008
  • 03.16.2008
  • 03.30.2008
  • 04.13.2008
  • 04.20.2008
  • Enough Already!

    Protect Free Speech!